This footage is what Charles Enderlin, under court order, presented to the initial panel of the appeals court in Paris on November 14, 2007. It contains most of the raw footage preserved by Enderlin from September 30, 2000. It poses multiple problems:

  • this footage is only 18 minutes long. But Talal Abu Rahma, who filmed it, made a statement under oath to the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, on October 3, 2000 that he filmed “approximately 27 minutes” of the Al Durah incident alone “which took place for 45 minutes.”
  • When interviewed by journalist Esther Schapira in 2001 Abu Rahma gave a different account,  saying that he filmed 6 minutes out of 45 minutes of the Al Durah sequence. (Only 78 seconds of that scene appears in the rushes. No more of that scene, if t exists, has ever been revealed by France2.)
  • Tala Abu Rahma also told Esther Schapira that on September 30, 2000 he filmed nearly two cassettes worth of material and that the end of Al Durah sequence ended approximately 15 minutes before the end of the second tape. Charles Enderlin, in a subsequent interview with Schapira gave a third version of filming, that flatly contradicted Abu Rahma’s account. Enderlin claimed that Abu Rahma filed only one tape that day, which was sent by microwave from Gaza to Jerusalem and recorded on a second tape, “something like” 23 minutes in length.
  • France2 revealed only 18 minutes of footage shot by Talal Abu Rahma from that day. However, Abu Rahma told Esther Schapira that by the end of the tape capturing the Al Durah sequence his batteries were dying? If Abu Rahma’s batteries were indeed dying, presumably he had been shooting for a long time. After all, Abu Rahma by his own account was at Netzarim Junction from about 7:00 in the morning and he filmed the Al Durah sequence that afternoon. The Reuters cameraman took over two hours of footage that day. It’s almost certain that there’s more to Abu Rahma’s footage than the 18 minutes France2 provided the court. (NB: Abu Rahma’s claim of a dying battery was one of the various explanations offered as to why he couldn’t shoot more than about a minute of alleged 45 minutes of shooting targeting the Al Durahs, a claim that Enderlin accepted without question in all his interviews and his book.)
  • the 18 minutes produced are an edited version of what Enderlin showed to a number of people beforehand, including Richard Landes. When Richard Landes viewed the tape at Enderlin’s office on October 21, 2003 the footage was over 21 minutes (i.e., with about three minutes missing), including a particularly embarrassing scene of an obvious and failed fake.
  • the abbreviated version of the footage provided the court still contains multiple examples of clearly staged footage (which presumably prompted the judges in the first panel of the Appeals Court to render a harsh judgment of Enderlin’s professional behavior).

For published material on what the tapes contain, see:

On seeing the France2 Tapes: Testimony by Richard Landes (November 2003)
Conversations with Charles Enderlin (November 2003)
France2 Tapes: Al Durah material (November 2003)
The Al Durah Case: A dramatic conclusion (November 2004)
Transcript of Radio Interview with Daniel Leconte and Denis Jeambar (November 2004)

Written by

The author didnt add any Information to his profile yet

Email
Print